css or 1.6 - Page 3

betik · 09-18-2007, 02:14 AM

1.6 ftw

3D-n1nj4 · 09-18-2007, 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by betik

1.6 ftw

Agree..

And The Text Looks Small To Me O_O

(But I'm High)

So I'll See In The Morning If It's Still Small :D

TheDevilGod · 10-03-2007, 10:05 PM

css for graphics 1.6 for skillz

Zurtle · 10-07-2007, 02:03 AM

Having played both 1.6 and back for a couple years, as well as Source.

Source is the superior game, better graphics BY FAR. Game play and game mechanics are also more fun.

I see all the 1.6 always complaining "oh even the newbs can own on Source"

That is the stupidest argument ever. The skilled will always dominate the newbs, that just the way both games are designed, I've played both, and guess what. The newbs are still getting owned, just like always.

Deaths Fear · 10-07-2007, 08:39 AM

Yes but do graphics make a game? Of course not, and I have played CSS and yes the noobs will still be noobs and get owned, but CSS is so much easier. I mean it's even been said, spraying is so much easier.
1.6 has a lot of the more hardcore players that go like 50 and 8 but still. 1.6 is based more on skill whereas CSS is based towards all and looks.
IMO its much more satisfying to kill a person with mad skills with a scout then a whole buncha noobs with a spray gun.

Zurtle · 10-08-2007, 12:16 AM

To each there own, but It's still essentially the same, the good players still are doing Head shot with the AK, head shot with the scout, etc etc. The good players rarely spray, sure the hitboxes are larger in source, but in my opinion that makes for a funner game. And contrary to popular belief, graphics do matter, sure they don't make the game, but they are still a very important element, adding to the enjoyment.

09-18-2007, 02:14 AM	#21
betik Veteran Member Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 278 Doubloons: 129.40	1.6 ftw __________________

10-07-2007, 08:39 AM	#25
Deaths Fear Extreme Poster Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 1,419 Doubloons: 102.60	Yes but do graphics make a game? Of course not, and I have played CSS and yes the noobs will still be noobs and get owned, but CSS is so much easier. I mean it's even been said, spraying is so much easier. 1.6 has a lot of the more hardcore players that go like 50 and 8 but still. 1.6 is based more on skill whereas CSS is based towards all and looks. IMO its much more satisfying to kill a person with mad skills with a scout then a whole buncha noobs with a spray gun. __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10-03-2007, 10:05 PM	#23
TheDevilGod Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 48 Doubloons: 6.81	css for graphics 1.6 for skillz

10-07-2007, 02:03 AM	#24
Zurtle Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 35 Doubloons: 338.20	Having played both 1.6 and back for a couple years, as well as Source. Source is the superior game, better graphics BY FAR. Game play and game mechanics are also more fun. I see all the 1.6 always complaining "oh even the newbs can own on Source" That is the stupidest argument ever. The skilled will always dominate the newbs, that just the way both games are designed, I've played both, and guess what. The newbs are still getting owned, just like always.

10-08-2007, 12:16 AM	#26
Zurtle Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 35 Doubloons: 338.20	To each there own, but It's still essentially the same, the good players still are doing Head shot with the AK, head shot with the scout, etc etc. The good players rarely spray, sure the hitboxes are larger in source, but in my opinion that makes for a funner game. And contrary to popular belief, graphics do matter, sure they don't make the game, but they are still a very important element, adding to the enjoyment.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)